Reauthorizing the Violence Against Women Act and the Partisan Response to Bipartisan Legislation

By:  Alexis Overstreet

Originally introduced by Senator Joseph Biden (D-DE) and enacted in 1994, the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA or the Act) has sought to ensure the safety of communities by providing resources to judges, prosecutors, law enforcement, and victims for nearing two decades.  Some studies have shown the incidence of domestic violence in the United States has fallen by approximately 50% since the Act’s inception.  Other studies indicate increased reporting of domestic violence, which could be a sign of increased awareness of resources made available through the Act.  VAWA has received consistent praise for drawing attention to a crime epidemic, which has predominantly prevailed in secrecy. 

Under the terms of VAWA, Congress must reevaluate and reauthorize the Act every five years because as society evolves our understanding of domestic violence increases, and new tactics may be necessary.  Lawmakers must address new scientific information gathered from various studies of domestic violence as well as reports from practitioners and advocates addressing the effectiveness of VAWA to update the Act and ensure effective and efficient responses to new issues arising within the field.  With each reauthorization, VAWA is reviewed and enhanced to provide up to date approaches for combating domestic violence.  VAWA was reauthorized in 2000 and 2005 and has generally enjoyed bipartisan support.

VAWA is currently undergoing reauthorization with several new provisions in the legislation.  Sponsored by Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and co-sponsored by Senator Michael Crapo (R-ID), the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2011 was introduced in the Senate on November 30, 2011.  Although VAWA’s reauthorization was introduced to the Senate in a bipartisan manner, it has since faced criticism.  On February 2, 2012 VAWA’s reauthorization bill passed the Senate Judiciary Committee on a 10 to 8 party-line vote.  Certain new provisions contained in the reauthorization bill have been the cause of ongoing controversy within the Senate since the bill’s introduction. 

One provision that has created push back among Republican members of Congress is added clarification that funds may be used for programs supporting LGBT victims.  A noted problem in addressing domestic violence has been the lack of resources available to LGBT victims.  VAWA’s reauthorization bill seeks to address this reality by clarifying that funds may be allocated to support this community.  The reasoning behind the clarification is that domestic violence impacts a wide range of society, and victims do not fit any specific status, meaning that the effect of domestic violence is not limited to those involved in heterosexual relationships.  The VAWA reauthorization bill addresses this fact by also prohibiting programs or activities receiving VAWA funds from excluding from participation, denying benefits to, or discriminating against anyone on the basis of their gender identity or sexual orientation.  The VAWA reauthorization bill does not allocate more protection to LGBT victims or create new programs to assist them; it simply clarifies that funds may be used to assist this group and prevents discrimination against its members.  Lawmakers included these provisions in an effort to reach and provide resources for every victim under VAWA.  The provisions promote Congress’s original intention to hold offenders accountable, keep communities safe, and support victims.  The argument is that VAWA should support all victims, regardless of identification as an individual with a nontraditional sexual orientation or gender identity. 

Some lawmakers have responded favorably to the LGBT clarification in the legislation.  Senator Chris Coons (D-DE) recently boasted that under the proposed VAWA reauthorization bill, “VAWA will be the first grant program in our federal government to explicitly state that grant recipients cannot discriminate on the basis of a victim’s status as part of the LGBT community.” (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-coons/violence-against-women-ac_b_1249516.html).  Other members of Congress have not viewed this clarification favorably.  Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA) voiced concern that allowing VAWA’s programs to provide resources to new groups of victims like LGBT individuals actually frustrates its goal of assisting victims.  Senator Grassley remarked, “If every group is a priority, no group is a priority” (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/14/violence-against-women-act_n_1273097.html).  Other critics of VAWA’s reauthorization have echoed this concern asserting the creation of various new programs is a misuse of funds.  Some have advocated for using social science research to more effectively allocate resources under VAWA.  Others believe VAWA should focus more on prevention providing education on domestic violence rather than intervention through prosecution.  The VAWA reauthorization bill’s sponsor, Senator Leahy is committed to the additional language prohibiting discrimination on the basis of gender identity or sexual orientation.  Senator Leahy believes a goal of VAWA should be to help all victims, regardless of identity, to provide equal protection to everyone. 

Supporters of the VAWA reauthorization bill claim that through consolidation and reductions in authorization levels, the bill manages to protect programs that have proven effective while cutting costs.  It also seeks to alleviate administrative burdens by improving application processes by streamlining and consolidating grant programs.  Others view this reduction in funding with criticism as these cuts have taken VAWA appropriations back to the 2000 reauthorization levels.  VAWA has never been fully funded since its inception, and many view these cuts as obstacles to VAWA reaching its full potential.  Many believe VAWA’s resources were already spread too thin, and the recent cuts in its budget have lawmakers and advocates questioning the practicality of VAWA’s seeking to reach every victim. 

While VAWA will likely be reauthorized, the recent opposition has highlighted serious problems, which persist in the legislation and require serious attention.  Increasing funding and eventually fully funding the Act can combat many of these problems.  One in four women have experienced physical violence by an intimate partner; one in six women have been stalked; and approximately one in five women have been raped in their lifetime.  Critics are likely correct to say resources are currently spread too thin, but this shortcoming should not be cause to give up on VAWA.  The gravity of this type of crime and these troubling statistics demonstrate the need to fully commit to VAWA.  It is disingenuous for lawmakers to voice support for VAWA and firm opposition to domestic violence in interviews and press releases.   Lawmakers should substantiate their commitment to fighting this epidemic through voting to fully fund VAWA.

Sources:

38 thoughts on “Reauthorizing the Violence Against Women Act and the Partisan Response to Bipartisan Legislation

    1. Unfortunately, I have nothing more than anaodctel evidence to add to the discussion…In my youth a young woman, for reasons never fully explained, unloaded a kick in my groin at the local pool. Later she muttered something about just wanting to see what would happen.Another charming young lady slapped my face and drove my head into a door jam. (She had been provoked—in spite of our familiarity with one another, I had transgressed established boundaries with a salacious remark. Still, a stern rebuke would have been more appropriate).Later in life I spent time with a woman who had a bit of a reputation for having a bad temper. She was a hundred and ten pounds soaking wet, standing five-foot-three-inches tall. There was nothing but dynamite packed into that frame, and if someone lit that short fuse—look-out. She backed big men down with shear ferocity.Another New England beauty—tall, lean and wonderful—recounts a story of an altercation with a demure smile. She had a close call on the road with a gentleman driving a Corvette. After a near collision both she and this man pulled over, each angry at the other. She climbed out of her vehicle, ran to the driver’s side of his car and began kicking the door, cursing like a modern sailor only wishes he could curse. The Corvette driving gentleman left abruptly without further engaging the beauty.One charming conversation with a modern woman ended abruptly when she declared men were the source of all relational discord. I left, shaking my head at the shear idiocy of her declaration.There are so many more tales to tell… Still, I’m only a male, and women are quite clearly superior in nature to my brutish, unthinking masculinity. Feh.

    1. For what it’s worth; remember when that woman cut off her hubsand’s penis? Bobbit I believe was his name?Many women journalist were celebrating that act, it was presented in many magazines as a victory for women…Can you imagine men journalist celebrating the fact that a man cut off his wive’s breasts?No one would publish that – ever.A couple of years ago some feminists were claiming that on Super Bowl day, violence against women increased a lot.They backed their claims with a study.Some tv stations – including ABC – even offered free air time to some women group, so they could inform people of that dangerous day…It turned out the whole thing was bogus, even the study was bogus.Feminists in general are very unfair.Feminists have replaced a tyranny with another.They should change their name for Hatemenist which is what they really are.

      1. I think Obama is still concerned with women’s iessus, but in regards to re-election, emphasis has to be on the economy & jobs.Keeping in mind the typical american, he has no choice but to keep hammering hope & reassurance.And i got mouths to feed!I got kids, man, kids kids, everywhere!(actually, i don’t. Thank God.)

  1. ” I’ve long thought that the best inditacor for family violence is the 2:1 ratio based on need for medical care. That is two female victims for every one male victim. That ratio has the best science to back it up. “Sorry but that does not tell you who is abusing who or who started the fight, it only tells you who won the fight or who is stronger, just like when a human gets bitten by a dog, the fact that the human is the one bleeding and the dog is not, does not tell you what happened.The fact that the human requires stitches does not prove the human was the victim or that the dog is vicious.You can not see the days or weeks of teasing and taunting the dog went through before it got to this point, you can only see the bite on the human’s hand.A few punches from a 5’2″ and 105 pound woman can not leave much of a mark on a man, but the damage on a woman’s face from one single punch from a 6’2” 250 pound man will make a nice front page photo for your local news paper…but it does not tell the story – at all.I could have gone with the car analogy; in a two car accident, does the fact that the compact car has suffered much more damage than the big SUV proves the SUV’s driver is the one who ran the red light?

  2. Hey. Cool article. There’s a problem with your site in chrome, and you may want to check this… The browser is the market leader and a huge component of other people will omit your wonderful writing because of this problem.

  3. Howdy! This post could not be written any better! Reading this post reminds me of my old room mate! He always kept talking about this. I will forward this write-up to him. Fairly certain he will have a good read. Thank you for sharing!

  4. Excellent weblog right here! Additionally your website lots up very fast! What web host are you the usage of? Can I get your associate hyperlink to your host? I desire my website loaded up as fast as yours lol

  5. It is really a nice and helpful piece of information. I am glad that you just shared this useful information with us. Please keep us up to date like this. Thanks for sharing.

  6. Hello there! Would you mind if I share your blog with my myspace group? There’s a lot of folks that I think would really enjoy your content. Please let me know. Thanks

  7. I must voice my passion for your kindness in support of individuals who need assistance with this particular topic. Your real dedication to passing the message around had been especially invaluable and have consistently made men and women much like me to achieve their objectives. Your own interesting guide can mean a lot to me and additionally to my office workers. Many thanks; from each one of us.

  8. Hello just wanted to give you a brief heads up and let you know a few of the images aren’t loading properly. I’m not sure why but I think its a linking issue. I’ve tried it in two different internet browsers and both show the same outcome.

  9. Good post. I learn something tougher on completely different blogs everyday. It should always be stimulating to read content material from different writers and observe slightly one thing from their store. I’d choose to make use of some with the content on my blog whether or not you don’t mind. Natually I’ll offer you a hyperlink on your web blog. Thanks for sharing.

  10. Please let me know if you’re looking for a article author for your weblog. You have some really great posts and I think I would be a good asset. If you ever want to take some of the load off, I’d love to write some articles for your blog in exchange for a link back to mine. Please send me an e-mail if interested. Kudos!

  11. I simply want to say I am all new to weblog and really loved your web site. More than likely I’m going to bookmark your blog post . You surely have very good well written articles. Thanks for revealing your webpage.

  12. Undeniably believe that that you stated. Your favourite justification appeared to be at the internet the easiest factor to remember of. I say to you, I definitely get annoyed at the same time as other folks think about concerns that they plainly don’t understand about. You controlled to hit the nail upon the top and also defined out the whole thing with no need side effect , other folks can take a signal. Will probably be again to get more. Thanks

  13. Your amazing blog has taught me a great amount info that I will much. Many thanks for your effort, and I hope you have plans to continue keeping this up.

  14. Pretty component to content. I just stumbled upon your blog and in accession capital to say that I get actually enjoyed account your weblog posts. Any way I’ll be subscribing on your augment or even I achievement you access persistently quickly.

  15. One important issue is that if you find yourself searching for a education loan you may find that you will need a cosigner. There are many scenarios where this is true because you could find that you do not possess a past credit history so the bank will require that you’ve got someone cosign the financing for you. Great post.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *